The standard for proving that literary hoaxes are just that, hoaxes is to produce the
original materials used by the hoaxers. What follows is a 20 to 50 year patch of
Egyptian history dating the accepted time of Moses. Along with this sketch of that
page from history I show the ties into the heart of the main events of the Bible.
I'm assuming you have reviewed other pages here and have some grasp of Egyptian
protocol. In particular, the notion that the female does not participate in the
reproductive process beyond the role of incubator. I frequently use the Virgin Mary
presented as the mother of God yet herself not God to make that point. Are not cats
always mothered by cats and dogs by dogs. Why is God an exception to the rule?
What ancient peoples believed, had undying faith in was based upon false science
rather than the accepted theory that they were simply stupid. Some of what I have
found of ancient false science is both below and on other pages here. You will find it
more than a little help to understanding what the Bible is actually based.
Copyright 2005-2006-2007 by William Edward Hunt
All rights reserved
What follows is the story from which the main arteries of the Bible were constructed.
In the interest of understanding the story I suggest you familiarize yourself with some
of the Bible's content. In particular, Exodus and the story of Moses leading 12 tribes
of people out of Egypt and to the wilderness where they built a tabernacle to the God
of the father of Moses. This is a widely known tale. There are others that are much
less well known you will find more than just helpful. They are Cain killing his brother
Able, the Tower of Babble, Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden, the beheading of
John the Baptist, Jesus chasing the money changers out of the temple of God and last
but not least, the most celebrated killing of all time, Pharaoh's firstborn son. I have
found all of these and more in the written historical record, not where they are said
to have happened in the Bible but in Egypt. What follows is proof beyond a reasonable
shadow of a doubt that Moses and Jesus are one and the same person, the NOT
Pharaoh, Amenophis IV and the God to whom Moses spoke, "the God of the father of
Moses" is the sun and nothing else.
The Bible is a selected set of 72 books from an original group that numbered over
850. The vast majority of those books were originated by people attempting to
translate the hieroglyphics of 3,300+ years ago to us and about 1,000 years earlier
than them. The Rosetta stone is the key to translating hieroglyphics today. It is
my opinion that the Greeks who created the Rosetta stone are the same set that
originated most all of those books. Later on Jews adopted a set of them and did a
little editing to make them fit their need to be "the chosen people of God" a lofty goal.
Constantine the great decided that was a good idea and also adopted a set of them
to meet his need, (All power comes from God) to be God's representative here on
earth. Today the work of both the Jews and Constantine threaten the foundation of
democracy, Nature's God. That is why I have decided to not remain silent and
continue the cover up. So what follows is the basis in fact for the important books
of the Bible, a hoax too many ways to count no doubt.
I had great difficulty in the English, Language and Literature department. I have little
difficulty in Science and Math. My mind is analytical, take things apart and understand
their inner workings. Things must be exact, no margin for error. Writings are exactly
the opposite, arguments to believe with little or no logical support. Human beings are
biological machines that function the same way as all logical machines, computers.
I say that all writings are composed of three things:
1. The writer's personal experiences.
2. What the writer has read.
3. The writer's imagination.
Then there is the obvious, the point to be made by the writing that is the result of
combining the above three things. Language and Literature classes put a heavy
emphasis on this, Writing With A Purpose. I'm not overlooking this aspect but
deemphasizing it. Of course I have purpose and so did the authors of the Bible.
Their purpose is the subject of great dispute I can add with no fear of error.
The Bible enjoys missing authors so knowing their personal experiences is impossible.
The best we can do is take the conditions at the time of the writing and do some
educated guessing about the writer's personal experiences.
The Bible is void in references to other documents for the most part. At the moment I
can't think of a single one. But we know the writers must have read something else
they could not write at all. The question I answer in what follows here is what they
read. What influenced their thinking to cause them to write the Bible.
Then we must take that to a second level of detail. The Bible is not a single writing but
a collection of independent but related by subject matter writings that were integrated
together into a somewhat continuous story.
The other option is the Bible is pure fiction. Even The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
isn't pure fiction. Mark Twain writes both into it his personal experiences and what he
read of other adventure stories. The writers of the Bible are subject to the same laws
of nature as Mark Twain. Buried perhaps amidst the fiction are facts that the authors
garnered from what they read. It is that which I present to you here. Keep in mind
that there is a lot perhaps of writing with a purpose, insertion of myth to make points.
And there was the need to make one author's tale dovetail with that of others so we
can expect there was some serious editing done at the time of integration.
I know Josehpus is the most likely original integrator. I can wonder if he is a single
person. The thing that blares at me from his writings is his references to students and
Greeks. What was he or they reading to write what they wrote? Some today are
calling him "the great Jewish fiction writer." I'm not there yet, still back well before him.
I am attempting to convey information to you. That makes me a teacher and you a learner. I have
my own way of learning things. I believe that it is better to know a little extremely well than to have
a vague idea about a great deal. Vague ideas invariably lead to misunderstanding. What I am
saying is learn a little at a time and get it on quick recall. Then you will be able to follow the story
without difficulty. So let us learn something that in mandatory to understanding.
I must request that you set aside your prejudice for just a moment and at least assume
that the word Pharaoh means God. That way I can welcome you to the kingdom of
God right here on earth. We all know there is but one God. That too has a problem
for us here. I must ask that you at least assume, there is but one God at a time. That
logically follows because if Pharaoh is God then we know there can be but one
Pharaoh at a time. What you will discover as we go along is the Bible happened when
that sacred rule was broken and several Pharaohs claimed to be the one true God at
the same time. One of them shows up as both Jesus and Moses in the Bible.
All Pharaohs except the very first were one and all Sons of God because all were
fathered by the previous God. That has a little kink in it too. Note that it's always son
and never daughter of God. The profusion of Gods that happened came about
because a woman decided there was gender discrimination in the kingdom of God
and did something about it. She spoke to God and before anyone could react she had
God right where she wanted Him. I say, don't argue with her for she was a lot meaner
than the snake on her bonnet. We'll meet her momentarily but first let's become
familiar with our cast of characters.
There are five people we need to have on quick recall, two sets of kings and queens
and then there is Moses and Jesus a NOT king or queen.
1. Thutmosis and his queen Mutemweya, (Samuel)
2. Amenophis III and his queen Tiye, (Virgin Mary and King David)
3. Amenophis IV, (Moses and Jesus)
Amenophis III is the son of Thutmosis and Mutemweya. Due to the way they, the
originators of the Bible saw human reproduction it was assumed that Mutemweya had
nothing to do with it. I am contending that as well as being a woman, Amenophis IV
was not fathered by Amenophis III. I'm not desk-pounding or wall-banging on that
point. I think I know where her body is and a little DNA testing can tell us for sure.
What I am saying other than Amenophis IV was a woman is that she appears in the
Bible as both superstars, Moses and Jesus. I'm making that case here.
If you are seeking that old time religion, Christianity then here it is.
The first sign that things aren't going the old way comes with Mutemweya seizing
power. There is some question as to exactly how she managed that. Remember the
Roman rule, Women are dirt where men plant people. The people demanded a king
but a queen is what they got. Did they realize it? We can say for sure they did not or
if they did God kept them in line. Mutemweya managed to get things no queen before
her ever got. The huge piles of rocks are still there to verify that.
Thutmosis succumbed to a rather human thing that is certainly unusual for a God,
alcoholism. While he lay drunk in his quarters Mutemweya grabbed the treasury and
made off with it in a manner of speaking. We must understand that money is power
and in all kingdoms the one who spent the money was the effective monarch be it the
king or otherwise.
Mutemweya did a very simple trick. She went into the room where God was and
spoke directly to God. Then she returned to the court and announced what God said.
Of course God said that she was in charge there, highly unusual don't you think. She
even came up with a warrant, a written document declaring that Thutmosis had turned
all over to her. Reluctantly, she accepted the challenge to fill God's huge shoes. I
agree with those who say that document is a forgery.
Mutemweya is the figure Samuel in the Bible. Samuel spoke directly with God.
Mutemweya spoke directly with God. Samuel did not get his way for Samuel wished
that only God would be the king of Israel. Mutemweya put the snake on her bonnet
and that makes her God. She was a God that spoke directly with God, Thutmosis.
Others were not allowed to do that. The God that wished that only God would be the
king of kings was God. Samuel was God. This makes perfect sense. Everyone
wants to be God don't they. But women, Samuel could not be God.
It's a bit of a mind twister and will never be understood without realizing that the snake
on Pharaoh's hat was the symbol of God. How did I make that determination? It's as
simple as noticing that hell as a place is unique to ancient Egypt, except for modern
religions. With the identification of Mutemweya as Samuel then it becomes a matter of
semantics, a little bit of mental chewing gum that is a lot like a ball of tar. It's the most
divine of revelations for with this identification combined with the history of ancient
Egypt, the rest of the Bible jumps out and hits one in the face. There's another clue
that is always overlooked.
When I say that Greeks are the originators of the base Biblical text I do that knowing
that only they employed an official seer, the Oracle of Delphi. So whoever looked at
the writing and noticed that Mutemweya was at odds with the people's demand for a
king neither understood why nor what the snake actually meant. They did see her
making predictions about the future that came true so they dubbed her, Oracle that
has been whitewashed, seer.
Mutemweya is the keystone of the Bible. It is technically her story but her
granddaughter Amenophis IV gets top billing as both Moses and Jesus. What is not
difficult to understand is that she had as a secondary goal at a minimum, women's
rights. This is almost impossible for modern folks to understand what with all the
famous queens of history none the least of which was Cleopatra who in particular must
be examined a lot more closely than just a glance. Cleopatra was a Greek that
succeeded Alexander the great who conquered Egypt on his famous world conquest
tour. It's an entirely different culture. The ancient Egyptian culture is reflected today in
the religious protocol that says no woman can be pope and elsewhere.
Pharaoh was officially known as the father of all mankind. That makes him his own
mother's father, the father of his queen as well as the father of all others. The
Egyptian queen was officially known as the mother of all mankind which gives her
similar attributes. The bottom line is expressed in the Bible with, Samuel's sons were
judges. Yes, if the queen is everyone's mother then her sons including her husband,
Pharaoh is her son. Pharaoh's are kings and kings are judges. Mutemweya like all
other queens before her had two sons that were judges, her husband Thutmosis the
king and her biological son, Amenophis III successor to Thutmosis. When we expand
that line of thought to the generic case of queen all Pharaoh's were her sons. I can
appreciate the difficulties Greeks or anyone has trying to make sense out of writings
that include references to this implied knowledge. Implied knowledge is always left
out but the results of it are not. What will future scholars do with terms like home run
and hail Mary pass to say nothing of playing hard ball?
Pharaoh and his queen fit the mold of Adam and Eve perfectly. The notion of calling
priests father probably has roots in Pharaoh, father of all mankind. The fourth
commandment which makes little more sense than one that said wash your hands
before eating suddenly falls into place when we realize it was written with general
case father and mother, Pharaoh and his queen in mind and not our parents who get
honored anyhow.
The ancient Egyptians had a lot of oddities that appear mysterious to us who don't
know what they were or why they were. When we connect Pharaoh to a place called
hell it suddenly makes a lot more sense. Of course that is degraded by our undying
faith in hell. Pharaoh used the threat of hell to gain the treasure of earth and
Mutemweya simply said girls can lie too. So lie she did with, "I spoke to God and God
said I'm in charge." Doesn't that, speaking with God have a familiar sound to it?
Mutemweya lied. Do others lie claiming they spoke to God?
What is abundantly clear is that the Israel of the Bible is actually Egypt. The word
Israel means builder which is slanged into carpenter. Saint Joseph the NOT father of
Jesus was a carpenter. Was he also a builder? Do carpenters build things? All
Pharaoh's were builders as a matter of command and not of fact. The Egyptian poor
dumb bastards did the back breaking work while Pharaoh got both the credit and the
reward. The workers got their reward in heaven just like Jesus tells us we will get if
we have faith and are righteous. Remember, only Egyptians were eligible for entry into
the kingdom of heaven ruled by dead Pharaoh symbolized by the vulture on his hat put
there beside the snake after his death.
Thutmosis lived long enough for Mutemweya to get a heaping helping of power and
she loved it. The poor dumb bastards chiseled away on HER grand palace, timeless
memorials and magnificent tomb probably thinking it was Thutmosis they were working
for while saving themselves from the fires of hell. But then Thutmosis kicked the
bucket and the people demanded a king. Samuel's son died and the people
demanded, kicked and screamed for a king. So reluctantly, Mutemweya anointed her
son, Amenophis III, king of Israel, or was that Egypt. In either case Mutemweya did
not surrender power. Thutmosis had been a front. Mutemweya laundered her power
through her sons the one she married, Thutmosis and the one that came out of her
belly. Gender discrimination is so obvious and Mz Mutemweya fought it tooth and
nail. She anointed her son, Amenophis III but DID NOT give him power.
When we compare the actions in the Bible to the actions in Egypt we get a 100% fit.
To do that one must know where in a rambling document like the Bible to look. The
key find is that Samuel is Mutemweya or the other way around whichever. At the time
I made that determination I had more than a hunch that Mutemweya was in the Bible. I
was thinking a female figure like the queen of Sheba. I decided to look and when I
opened my Bible at random it was in the book of Samuel and I read the words,
"Samuel wished that only God would be king" and that ended my search almost sooner
than it began. Was Samuel wishing for a supernatural being or a person?
Mutemweya did not surrender the power and no where is it more obvious than in his
picking of a queen. Where I come from they'd say "She raised that boy right." Was he
doing what his mother told him to do in picking his queen? I think so. There's a lot of
ladies best hopes here. Keep in mind that queens had no choice before now.
Amenophis III got into his chariot and galloped down to the pea patch, stopped, got out
and pointed at a peasant girl down on her knees picking peas. He exclaimed in a loud
voice, "That woman shall be the next queen of Egypt." Cinderella never had it so good.
The handsome prince brought the ball to her. Her name was Tiye. She was NOT
Egyptian.
That sent a shock wave through the court. Everyone had an opinion about the queen
being a commoner and worse yet a foreigner. Who had the final say? I believe it was
Mutemweya. She was the power that was and the logic of an unsophisticated queen
suited her purpose. Mutemweya did NOT need a lady of quality around the palace to
tell her where to get off is how it would be said today. We can say with little
reservation that Tiye won the lottery.
Not only did Mutemweya influence her son in his picking of the queen but it shows even
more so in the courtship that followed. Amenophis went personally to the trailer park
and knocked on her, Tiye's door. Bent and bowed and ask her mother's permission to
court her daughter. Did a formal courting according to Tiye, a foreigner's customs.
Proposed on bended knee. Went back to the tailer and ask her father for her hand.
He got lucky and everyone in the chain said yes. Tiye's parents were rewarded with a
big house and a cushy government job, (secretary of defence) for dad.
Another interesting tidbit is the fact that Amenophis III received a wedding present that
today would seem outrageous. One of those puppet kings, Philistine, (wink wink) sent
Amenophis his daughter who he graciously accepted and brought along on the
honeymoon. They just did things different back then no doubt. As everyone knows,
God is a prolific breeder.
About nine months later both the queen and the gift princess delivered babies. Both
were males. I usually invite English king Henry VIII to eat his heart out but I wont. Are
we looking at the difference in the breeding capabilities of kings and Gods?
Then disaster struck. Tiye's baby named for his grandfather, Thutmosis suddenly
died. Again I will point out that regular folks didn't get a lot of press. This is a perfect
fit with still another Bible tale, the wisdom of Solomon. Two women under one roof,
both have babies and one suddenly dies. Then the women dispute which is the real
mother of the living baby. Only a man would come up with a scenario like that.
Babies and mothers know each other. However, the rest of the story is true. The
other baby was considered to be next on the list to die. Was little Thutty murdered?
This tale also appears in the Gospels as the slaughter of the babes. Remember that
one. The mean king was killing babies. Yes, the mean grandmaw was killing male
heirs to the throne of Egypt. Samuel wished that only God would be the king of Israel
but the people demanded a king. Little Thutmosis won't be it said Muetmweya as she
whacked her own grandson. Power does that to people. The princess saw what had
happened and guessed that her son was next. I don't think so but she didn't ask me
and I doubt if she would have trusted me to know. Know what? The next Pharaoh
MUST be the issue of the body of the queen so the other male baby was NOT an
heir to the throne. But that didn't stop the princess from grabbing her baby and the
king and fleeing the palace.
All they got wrong is who St Joseph left with on his baby-life saving trip to Egypt. The
rest of the story fits both the wisdom of Solomon and the slaughter of the babes,
100%. Some people did a poor job translating some odd looking writings somewhere.
Egypt? St Joseph and the other woman didn't have far to go did they? Was he the
father of the baby threatened by the murderous monarch? Was Mutemweya a
monarch? Did gender make any difference in the minds of those doing the
translations? Had they understood the protocol they would have known better. The
other baby, the one saved from Granny was not threatened at this time because he
was not a candidate for the office of Pharaoh by the rules laid down in the sacred
protocols of God.
Amenophis III was real scarce around the palace for a very long time. He, the princess
and their love child lived in the royal tent, on the royal yacht, at the royal wild bull hunt,
and anywhere and everywhere but the seat of government. Naturally, Mutemweya
spoke to him, God and got her new set of "you're in charge" orders from time to time.
The writings concerning this say that Amenophis bonded with his love child teaching him
to hunt and fish. Just reading the text without knowing it was the son of God with his
mistress one might visualize a normal family. We know normal has a much different
meaning for them. This went on for the better part of 25 years. Amenophis loved his
yacht and used it as living quarters and he taught his surviving son to sail as the little
family roughed it away from the luxurious life at the palace. Being nobility may not be
all it's cracked up to be. Life can be tedious on the royal yacht.
When we look over the playing field and locate all the players the notion that Tiye won
anything one might want vanishes. While the king was out with the other woman living it
up at the royal this and that, she was left back at the palace with mother in law. And,
applying the protocol we see something else. Tiye had the royal vagina by order of
God. Through it would pass the son of God but not if Grandmother had anything to do
with it. This is a fine point that one must take into account. The Biblical references
are several with the most important being the Virgin birth. The protocol said that the
king could do as he pleased breeding whomever, wherever he felt like and the woman
had no say so in that. In other words if the king saw a woman that looked good he
found out if she was as good as she looked. This was made up to the queen by
putting her under guard. After all, the issue of the body of the queen will be God and
we know that as cats are only fathered by cats then Gods must follow suit and only be
fathered by Gods. So they could not allow the queen to accept people seeds from
anyone except God else confusion. Oh my, you forgot the science, Women are dirt
where men plant people. Queens are women!
Some time about the fifth anniversary of the royal wedding, Amenophis III and Tiye and
in the absence of Amenophis, Tiye became pregnant. It's my understanding that the
same thing happened in the Gospels. Well, Tiye isn't virgin but that's just a minor
detail. We get a second hit on Amenophis III playing the role of St Joseph. This time
his wife is pregnant and he didn't do it. Did someone impregnate her or was there a
real immaculate conception? She was guarded you know. What did the captain of the
guard say? Who was let into the queens quarters? His reply had to be no one else his
head would roll. So even if he knew he would certainly not say. In the end the truth
came out.
We can find that story at Sodom and Gomorrah where homosexual type activities were
the norm. The Bible says men laying with men. Do we have a failure in gender
recognition? The usual suspects are the queen mother and the queen and they are
both ladies. Did those attempting to translate the writings get the gender wrong?
Again? That still does not explain the pregnancy. Well, not unless we look at the
whole story. Lot fled from the homosexual scene and brought his daughters along.
There was more than one female that was a daughter. There you go again forgetting
that all women were Pharaoh's daughters but the only ones to ever get any press were
the queens. So they got the story a little cockeyed. But who is Lot? We know that
the male-female sex was between Lot and his daughters. Who might the guards think
was an innocent male to be let into the queens quarters alone with her or even in the
presence of God, Mutemweya? But of course the queens father. Yayu is his name.
And Mutemweya might just have coddled her wife, Tiye with a little heterosexual sex to
go along with all that homosexual type.
We can't be sure about anything except the pregnancy. That's a certainty. Since
gender determination is still a problem with ancient Egyptian writings could it be that
the product of this pregnancy, Amenophis IV is a female. The accepted, committee
made determination is that Amenophis IV is a male. Could that be in error? Can you
look at a picture? If her mummy is pointed out will the committee retract or will they
say it's the body of his sister? That remains to be seen. Right now we have a
pregnant queen to worry about.
Again we have several Biblical hash and rehashes of the story. The Nativity is the one
we will focus our attention on here. About nine months later we find Tiye on the
queen's yacht in the near vicinity of what today is known as El Amarna. Why was she
there? We have two explanations. One says that she absented herself from the
palace to have the baby. The other says she was on official business. Both are in the
Bible according to which version of the unusual birth one wants to accept as so. The
Nativity is widely known and that was the official business scenario. The other one
that fits is the impregnated servant Hagar that ran away and bore Abraham's son,
Ishmael. There are others no doubt. All who tried to translate the writing had a
different opinion and almost all if not all have ended up in the Bible.
There is another piece to this puzzle. About the same time there was a near super
volcano. No doubt about it, God was angry. The Greek island of Santa Rina literally
lost it's head. The noise was so loud it was heard in Scandinavia. The poison gas
cloud swept across the island of Crete killing all wiping out a civilization. This sort of
thing causes temporary changes in the weather that accounts for what happened next.
A west to east moving storm suddenly struck. The best account is not in the Bible per
say but in other religious writings and is the recorded battle in the sky between the
fallen angel Lucifer and the faithful angel, Michael. This battle between good angels
and bad ones also gives us supporting evidence that the sun is the God of the father of
Moses. Eye witnesses said that the demons in the sky ate the sun. I believe that this
is the source of the demon in the underworld that eats people all gone forever, Eater.
Satan, one of God's magistrates who administers the lie detector test has probably
been confused with Lucifer and thus given a bum rap. Anyhow, there were high winds
and a terrible fight in the sky.
The winds caused the queens yacht to go out of control. It was blown ashore on the
east bank of the Nile and the queen marooned in the wilderness. The area today is
known as El Amarna but at the time no one lived there. Nine of the ten plagues can be
accounted for with this event which was a super big deal and recorded. Flies biting is
a sign of rain, (Old Farmers Almanac). So are dead frogs on the desert. Rain is frog
moving day. They hopped out of the river and onto the desert, settled in puddles and
died of heat exhaustion when the puddles dried up. The Nile turning to blood is as
simple as the fact that the Egyptians were not familiar with two things that happened.
First, they were on the east bank of the river which was unusual of itself but the
overcast sky and the winds kicking up waves churned up silt from the bottom making
the river an odd color to begin with. During this type of storm it is not unusual to have
breaks in the clouds and when that happened and the sun's rays were reflected off the
water made the otherwise murky look to be that of blood. In all events this was a
harrowing experience for the group.
I think of the maiden episode of Gilligan's Island where the tiny ship was tossed to
visualize the situation. That is certainly no place to be giving birth. Not only was there
no room at the Inn, there was no stable either. One excluded Gospel says that the
Virgin Mary sought shelter in a cave. In this case Tiye is in the middle of a field with
rain, wind and hail and not only without shelter but nothing more than her clothes. The
baby did not come until after sunset and with the cloud cover there wasn't even
starlight. I don't think it's possible to identify worse conditions than these. She was in
the open, with rain and hail, pitch black dark and not so much as a blanket. But she did
manage a live birth.
The star of Bethlehem is described as a light as bright as day. The only light in nature
that fits this description is lightening. When one examines the Amarnan landscape and
combines the geography with a little knowledge of electrical law it becomes obvious.
The area is surrounded on three sides by cliffs. When the west to east moving clouds
reached the cliffs the distance from cloud to earth is abruptly shortened making the
likelihood of lightening strikes very high. The Bible says star. What were the writers
reading? The sun is a star you know. How could they tell it wasn't the sun?
The queen and many others were marooned on the wrong side of the river all night in
the shivery cold damp air. Eventually the storm blew over but seeing the sun being
devoured made them more than a little anxious which brings us to a real star, the sun.
They were more than thrilled when the sun again rose in the sky and then something
supernatural happened. It shone through a crack in the cliffs and right onto the
newborn baby. With no notice at all the sun suddenly began to dance. Obviously, the
baby had been fathered by the sun. Only the father contributes to the child that begins
as a people seed, semen. Ah you backsliders you. Pay attention, Women are dirt
where men plant people seeds. Did the virgin Mary give birth to the Son of God but
was not herself God? Not if Miz Mutemweya has anything to say about it and she's
doing all the talking at the moment.
When significant people like queens have this kind of experience it's reported. It
routinely happens to hog farmers in Illinois and goes without notice. Well, they don't
birth their babies this way but hair raising thunderstorms are far from unusual. They
were highly unusual at this time in ancient Egypt. No one at the scene had ever seen
or even heard of such a thing. Naturally there was a great many questions about not
only what it was but why. The correct answer is obvious. It was the birth of the Son of
God and the biggest devil of them all Lucifer showed up with all the other fallen angels
to resist. Michael, the good angel came to the rescue and chased Lucifer not just
away but put him and his into the fires of hell. Not only that, the one true God, the sun
got kicked out of heaven but managed to return when Michael cleared the way.
Rumors God had been eaten all gone were discredited when the sun again came off
the mountain where God lives and flew into the sky as usual.
There are those that say St John, author of Revelation was inspired by God to use
this same epic battle to illustrate how things will be when Jesus returns. There were
those at the time who said that the baby actually came out of the sky and not out of
Tiye's belly. I've seen it rain pitch forks and bull frogs myself so I won't argue.
Maybe St John should have worn latex gloves. Don't you think?
Again we will call upon knowledge to guide us. No one but the upper crust got any
press. What was the press of that day? It was writing on the wall that included a lot
of pictures. One of those pictures showed a baby in what looked like a basket. It
wasn't a basket. It was a boat. Not only did they use pictures to express their
thoughts but they also used picture adjectives. It was a royal baby so it filled the entire
boat. How do we know that? If it were alphabetical writing then it would say big shot
baby. Filling the entire boat says just that, big shot. We can associate Moses with the
queen and with that tidbit of knowledge also makes him the baby of record that was
brought to the palace via boat, royal yacht. So what were the authors of Exodus
looking at when they wrote it? Hieroglyphic writings.
Jesus was asleep on the boat in Her mother's womb when a terrible storm hit. Later,
Jesus woke up by being born and then She calmed the waves. In other words She
walked all over them. The only unusual thing that happened besides the storm was the
birth of the new King of Kings. It must have been Her magical God powers that
restored order. Even as nothing more than babies the Gods are capable of doing
miracles. They are Emmanuel's a common name in the romance languages that
translates into English, hands of the gods.
Amenophis IV is an odd looking person. There was a time when I would have bet
those odd looks came from incest. Then I noticed that the artist had either taken
license or been instructed to draw her pictures as we see them. The face of
Amenophis IV is that of a lion. That sums it up all by itself. Either she was a lot more
odd looking than we have observed or she regulated the art to her choosing. I think the
notion of looking like a lion was her idea and that her pictures do not reflect her real
face. So having herself drawn with a female body says that either she was or wanted
to be female. Since no woman can ever be Pharaoh and she wanted that then she
must have just let that part of her appearance slip through. That was a mistake at a
minimum. Yes, the writing says male. It had to otherwise Pharaoh is impossible.
The actual childhoods of Amenophis IV, Moses and Jesus all three are very skimpy.
We do get a connector with Jesus brought to the temple about age 10. There is a
sketchy account of Amenophis IV being presented at court on a formal basis at about
that age. It says that the court birds were impressed with how bright HE was.
Once one gets the feel for Mutemweya and her desire that only God will be the king of
Israel we can use that as an additional clue that Amenophis IV was female. Had Tiye
brought another male heir to the throne into the palace she would have killed it.
Because of the lack of information we are going to skip ahead the better part of 20
years in time or even a year or two longer. Amenophis IV was a young adult.
Amenophis IV was now a teenager perhaps 17 or 18 when an Evil spirit entered the
body of Amenophis III. That poor boy had been living it up everywhere but the palace
when he was struck with abscessed teeth. He did a foolish thing treating the pain with
alcohol. Those teeth hurt so bad he couldn't eat without being stone drunk and even
then only sparingly. Amenophis III was already an alcoholic, a common ailment of all
the greats of history. All he did was go on a steady around the clock drink until the
pain was numbed. It doesn't take long for that bet to pay off. He began hallucinating
and was brought to the palace in a straight jacket. They could not let the son of God
go screaming down the street insisting that monsters were chasing him.
This scenario maps one for one into the Biblical account of what happened to King
Saul. Specifically, "An evil spirit entered his body and he became melancholy" which
is as gentle as it can probably be stated and still describe the situation with any
degree of accuracy.
This like so many other events in the Bible is unique in history. Kings are kings for life
and must die to get shed of them. They can be and have been murdered of course.
The notion of firing a king and letting him live and especially occupy the palace is
unheard of. So again, we have a Biblical and historical one of a kind.
The scene is the king's quarters in the palace at Thebes. It's early morning and the
king has had a bad night. He's laying on the softest bed there was at the time. His
teeth are killing him, his head feels like a watermelon that's been dropped and cracked
and the tastes in his mouth defies description. A fresh beer is on the stand and he's
struggling to swallow it when across the polished stone floor comes mother slithering
like the snake on here forehead her voice raised in anger.
She stands by the bed looking down at him cowering like a whipped dog, he looks at
her out of the corner of his eye. The moment passes and she raises her voice. "You
should see yourself, the mighty Pharaoh, King of Kings, Lord of Lords." Her voice
penetrates his aching head making the sound of a thousand bells all out of tune. Poor
Amenophis III could only grimace and pray she would go away. And she did but not
before she uttered the magic words, "you're fired" that came only after an extended
volley of insults.
Of course Mutemweya went back to court and announced that she had spoken to God
and God said that she was STILL in charge there. Furthermore God was in no
condition to continue his Godly duties and the queen, Tiye was replacing him. Of
course there were objections since Tiye is a woman and everyone knows no woman
can possibly be God. Mary was crowned king, not queen.
Mutemweya fired her son and anointed her daughter in law, Tiye not king but monarch.
This was an overt attempt to elevate the status of women and give them equal rights to
the throne. As the Bible clearly says, the firing of Saul and the anointing of David did
not take. Saul continued to be the king in spite of the fact that David too was king.
Samuel got his authority directly from God and so did Mutemweya. It's optional which
God that was. She spoke to her son the God and probably talked to herself
occasionally too. That notion of optional only applies to us the observers and not to the
high priest who's call it was to scream blasphemy. The fact that he didn't tells us that
Mutemweya had the power to have him shot or at least convinced him so. But things
were not all that easy for the mother of God. Remember, the people demanded a
king. Do two queens beat a king? This isn't poker they're playing.
It's perfectly clear that there was a dispute between the high priest and Mutemweya.
It manifests itself in what happened next. Obviously, the high priest did not roll over
and play dead for her and invoked the protocol. Mutemweya seems to have lost some
of her vinegar at this point and did not attempt to stop him. This can also be seen as a
judo throw where the momentum of the attacker is used against him. There is also the
most likely scenario which left Mutemweya with the whole bag of marbles and what
happened next was part of a longer term strategy that left women in charge altogether
for all time in the end. That seems to be her overall plan.
To understand this act one must know another piece of the protocol. When Pharaoh
was assumed to be near death a Co Pharaoh was anointed. Amenophis III was surely
near death. All you had to do to find that out was to ask him. However, access to
even a wounded Pharaoh was strictly limited, a card well played by Mutemweya. Not
even the high priest was allowed to enter God's private quarters but we know he had
an information source and was not all that much in the dark. I think he saw an
opportunity on the horizon for himself to become Almighty God. Could he be Ramses?
Ramses, conqueror of Israel is name the big winner gave himself later.
What exactly is a co regent as it is commonly called? That's the next son of God, the
next Pharaoh. The problem is that Amenophis III has failed to produce a male heir to
the throne. I'm taking back some of the things I said about Henry VIII earlier. There
was a male heir, Thutmosis who had a sudden case of something and died while still an
infant. Yes, there is a male son of Amenophis III whom we are calling his love child the
issue of the body of his favorite woman and not the queen. The protocol said that
only the issue of the body of the queen was qualified to be Pharaoh. Yes again,
there is an issue of the queens body. It has two significant problems. It was not
fathered by the king and it is not a male. Otherwise all is well.
So at this moment there are two potential candidates neither of which is qualified
according to the protocol. Now if the bastard son, love child is anointed then the
problem is solved but the protocol has been violated. If Amenophis IV is chosen then
again the protocol is violated. Which one will the high priest turn his back on and look
the other way? Which one gives him the best chance later to become Ramses which
literally translated means conquerer of Israel? My compliments to the high priest for
making a wise decision. Had he have chosen the other way the history of the world
would look radically different than it now does no doubt.
The Most Celebrated Killing of All Time
There are two highly celebrated killings in history, Pharaoh's firstborn son and Jesus.
We are now at the point in the story where the firstborn will be killed. That has to be
tempered by the fact that earlier his firstborn was killed by it's grandmother or most
likely, the one who actually whacked the little dude was acting under her orders. Once
we understand that her wearing of the snake on her bonnet made her God then we can
say that God was behind that killing too. But the killing at hand is that of not the
firstborn issue of the body of the mother of God but that of the issue of the body of the
other woman, Amenophis III's love child that he wanted as his heir to the throne.
Of course this is PASSOVER that is celebrated by all Bible based faiths and some that
are not no doubt. Therefore it is the most celebrated taking of human life in all the
history of the world. The Bible is vague of course in exactly who got whacked and who
got passed over. We now have enough information, evidence if you like to identify
them. The one that got hit by an angel of the God of the father of Moses was
Amenophis III's love child, the issue of the body of the other woman and the one that
got passed over was the issue of the body of the queen, Amenophis IV.
In passing let us note that this is the identical scenario of a mafia style gangland hit.
The easy way to say it based upon the exact words of the Bible is that Moses had a
disagreement with Pharaoh so he did like a mafia Don and being unable to reach his
adversary directly resorted to attacking his family. The hit went to the streets and God
fielded it sending one of His angels to do the detail. What's missing is just how much
Moses put on the victim's head, how much money did he pay God for doing the hit.
Note: Pharaoh's son is the father of all mankind to be and therefore all firstborn sons of
Egypt were spiritually killed at the same time he was. Those dauntless Greeks.
When we check the news of the day it's always bad. It's about all the rapes and
murders, and all the turmoil in government as just quick examples. This is not new. It
has been going on every since there has been news. Therefore we can say that this
event, the killing of the son of the most important man in the world made all the
headlines and overshadowed all other events of the day. Then we must look at where
the reporting of the news was done to say nothing of how it was done. What is
paramount to chicken tracks in wet cement with a few pictures of unidentifiable people
Scattered within was done on walls so everyone would know what happened. When
we come to that understanding the rest is obvious. Perhaps no two people actually got
the true meaning of what was written and therefore there will be as many version as
there are versioners.
That is my finding and applying it with a little help from my knowledge of mathematics
I have been able to reconstruct the story. Realizing that I was looking at the original
story used to construct the Bible combined with the fact that the writings had to be
interpreted I expected that the Bible would have more than one version of the single
event. It does. The killing of the firstborn Egyptian is just one of many interpretations
of the unreadable writings on the wall. In other presentations I have numbered them.
Here I will simply address each and warn you that I haven't gotten them all in my
opinion.
Pharaoh's firstborn was whacked by an angel sent by God and the beneficiary of the
killing was an individual known as Moses. With the attack on his family, Pharaoh
reluctantly allowed the chosen people of the God of the father of Moses to pack up
and leave Egypt. There were 12 tribes of them, a tribe being a group of related
people. Moses led them to the desert where they built a tabernacle, worshiped,
honored, adored, glorified and made sacrifices to the God of the father of Moses. The
God of the father of Moses lives on a sacred mountain now assumed to be mount
Sinai. The God of the father of Moses is a being, entity, thing that lives in fire, the
specific type of fire is the one that burns but does not consume. The 12 tribes of
people are now known as Israelites. There were difficulties in the desert where the
tabernacle was built including but not limited to shortages of food and water that were
overcome by miraculous events with the God of the father of Moses being credited
with the miracles. It has been assumed that the place where the tabernacle was built
was in the Sinai desert. There is more but space limitations dictate that I cut it short
here. This is enough.
Pharaoh's firstborn son was whacked by an agent sent by a woman wearing the
symbol of God, a golden cobra on her bonnet and the beneficiary of the killing was
Amenophis IV. The Pharaoh's name was Amenophis III who probably didn't know it
happened. With the killing, Amenophis IV led twelve groups of people out of Egypt to
the wilderness where they built a tabernacle, worshiped, honored, adored, glorified
and made sacrifices to the sun. All believed the sun lived on a mountain in the east.
Amenophis IV believed the sun was her biological father. Of course there's more but
isn't this enough?
Where did the 12 groups of people Amenophis IV led to the wilderness come from?
The answer is everywhere but Egypt but they were in Egypt at the time. Why did She
rely on foreigners to build her tabernacle to her father? Because of the sacred
protocol.
Understanding the protocol is mandatory if one is to understand why Egyptians did
NOT build Akhetaten. The protocol said that all work would be done for the living
God that was alive at the time. It was a matter of saving ones life in both this world
and the next. It was believeded by the Egyptians that Pharaoh had the keys to
heaven's gate and the power to decide who would and who would not be let into
heaven, (next live) and stay out of jail here on earth. Pharaoh formalized that scheme
by an obvious lie saying that he operated a road block on the nebol bridge. When we
combine those two bits of knowledge, why foreigners were used becomes crystal clear.
Only Egyptians were judged worthy to enter the kingdom of God in the next world.
That was also true in this world. Foreigners were not let into the Egyptian world as
even the least of peoples, subjects of the king and therefore it went without ever saying
it that they would not be let into Pharaoh's next world which we today call heaven.
Amenophis III was the God of record. Working for another God violates the first
commandment. Non Egyptians do not have that problem just like Atheists don't have
to worry about breaking God's rules right now. They're not getting into heaven.
When we notice that Mutemweya was actually calling the shots, had the bucket with
all the money in it then what happened makes even more sense. She was out to grab
the Egyptian crown away from men and turn it over to women to run. The high priest
is technically the joker in the deck. He's just biding his time waiting for the right
moment to take over the kingdom of God himself. Where is God while all this is going
on? He's in his quarters nursing a bad hangover in between creating new ones.
We have a purchase order Amenophis III sent to Persia to buy 40 women. It clearly
specifies none with high screechy voices. If he didn't have a hang over then there is
no such thing. That poor boy was a basket case. He was about 45 years old and
his bad teeth coupled with alcoholism was complicated by male menopause. Nero
wasn't the first to fiddle while things burned right under his nose.
At this point you have more than enough evidence to declare the Bible to be a hoax.
The God of the father of Moses is identified. It's the sun. Moses has been identified
with some obvious complications none the least of which is gender. Other
identifications have been made including the kings of Israel, the virgin Mary and Jesus.
You can make the decision now or you can wait. In either case let me invite you to
read on. Like I said, the killing of the son of God was a big deal and lots of
interpretations of what happened appear in the hoax. So let us continue. After we look
at a few of those we'll see Jesus magically appear.
Since we now know that the term daughter of the king actually means queen we
have a head start to understanding how someone could misinterpret the killing of the
firstborn. The actual writing that has the saga of John the Baptist was no doubt a
single paper made by one trying to read the writing on the wall. What did he see?
There was an individual who was related to Jesus somehow. That individual was killed,
beheaded so the Bible says. His grasping a word or two here and there led him to the
daughter of the king which he didn't understand was actually the queen. Furthermore
had he have understood he had a monumental task in separating and identifying any
particular queen since there was two of them and a third that certainly looked more like
a queen than a king. So he got a little something straight. A woman was behind it!
Mt 14:13 When Jesus heard of it, he departed thence by ship to a desert place
We need to look a little more carefully at where they supposedly were and the idea of
departing by ship to anywhere. If they were at Thebes then Amenophis IV could and
did, in a due matter of time depart by royal yacht for a desert place. Today that place
is known as El Amarna. When she first went there it was a desert. It became a
tabernacle. Just a little hook into the fact that Amenophis IV is Jesus.
The wedding gift princess to Amenophis III was probably a Philistine don't you expect.
We now know who king David was. Did "little" Tiye actually take the sword from
Amenophis III's love child and whack his head clean off and then to add insult to injury,
hold it high for all to see. David killing Goliath is a famous Bible story. Someone
looked at the writing on the wall and credited the queen with the killing of Pharaoh's
firstborn son. But which queen was it? It's my best guess that Tiye was too timid to
kill a fly and was just a reed in Mutemweya's rapids.
So what is correct in the David and Goliath story. A big man got whacked. He got that
straight. The queen was behind the whacking. That too is correct. The queen was
misidentified but that is expected under the circumstances. He got the size of the
queen correct, little as stated. Little has three correct bases. Women are usually
smaller than men. Women were always drawn smaller than life in most hieroglyphics.
And, Tiye was of humble origin, a little person on the standard social scale.
Moses supposedly left Egypt twice. Above we saw her leave the second time. That's
known as getting ahead of one's self. Someone got parts of the story correct. What
parts? An Egyptian big shot got murdered in his estimation and he tagged Moses with
the murder. Luckily and probably with supernatural help Moses escaped Egypt with
the police hot on his trail. Later, at the base of the mountain where God lives Moses
had a conversation with God. What part of that is so? Moses left Egypt and spoke to
God. Those accompanying Moses, 12 tribe of slaves were not noticed. And, he also
got the part correct about Moses speaking to the God of HER father that lives on a
mountain in the east. What he left out was a good enough description of God for us to
recognized it as the sun. He probably couldn't spell sun.
The conversation Moses had with God is the pivot point of the history of the world.
One can only imagine what the world would be like today if that conversation had never
taken place. Did it? Yes it did but it was certainly one sided and far from what the
Bible says. The sun has never spoken to anyone yet there are many accounts of
people talking to it. The funny farm has a selection of sun talkers right now. Which
one do you believe?
This conversation between Moses, (Amenophis IV) and the God, (god) of his, (her)
father is the significant hoax of the Bible. It's as innocent looking as the misspelling of
the word god calling the sun, God. This compares favorably with a person under a
sheet in the grave yard at dusk. Just an innocent looking lie that people are desperate
to believe and willing to die rather than admit the truth. I saw a ghost, really, honest...
The individual who wrote this tale got almost all the story correct. Someone killed or
had killed a brother of that someone. God got upset in his estimation and punished
that person by putting a strange mark on his forehead that some said looked like a
horn sticking out and banished him to the wilderness where he built a big house that
collapsed when he died. This story has 100% of the significant actions. The brother
was killed for the benefit of Amenophis IV. The strange mark was not punishment but
rather a reward, the symbol of God, the golden cobra that sticks out and in profile
looks like a horn. The trek to the wilderness was also a reward. Amenophis IV was a
teen age girl that kicked and screamed to be allowed to build a palace for her father,
the sun. The big house was built and called Akhetaten just as reported. The only
uncertain part is about her death when that big house, the tabernacle collapsed which
we will review a little later on here.
The tale about the "Tower of Babel" is one of the most mysterious in the Bible. It has
zero foundation in any record of any kind until now. Someone tried to read the writing
on the wall precipitated by the killing of Pharaoh's firstborn son. What part did he get
straight? Well, he noticed that the people Amenophis IV led to the wilderness were of
different origins. What else about them? They did not speak the same language.
They babbled at each other. What else did he notice? That whatever they were
building almost got done and it was some sort of building to God and surmised that
God was in the sky and therefore that building must be a tower and the builders were
attempting to get UP to God. He also noticed that God got upset but failed to
disconnect the upset God from the God in the sky. So he concluded that God struck
them with a confusion of tongues and they scattered to the four winds. Remember this
scattering of the Akhetaten's builders, Israelites. A clue! What actually happened to
the builders of Akhetaten? Most likely they became laborers elsewhere in Egypt.
We have taken time out to examine the source of the Bible's stuttering at one level.
There is another duplication of stories that will not be addressed here. Perhaps Egypt
isn't the only source for everything.
Let us quickly recap. Mutemweya gained power through her king and by today's
standards, husband, Thutmosis. When Thutmosis died she did not give that power up
but had no choice other than use her son Amenophis III as a front. Up until where we
are in the scenario that has worked well but only while Amenophis III was healthy. His
health seeming to fail the rules concerning his replacement kick in. She tries to get by
with the anointing of his queen, Tiye the monarch. But the protocol will not allow that.
The other complication for her has been seeing to it that there will be no male heir to
the throne by the killing of the only one, little Thutty, the son of Amenophis III and his
queen, Tiye. The protocol demanded that a co regent be anointed. Since there is no
male heir the dynasty must collapse. Only God may father a God and the mother of
God doesn't count. I don't think succession in the case of no heir was accounted for in
the protocol which set the stage for a power struggle that was settled when the
biological son of the king was killed leaving only the biological daughter of the queen,
Amenophis IV. The temptation of the high priest to let the dynasty collapse was
probably part of the overall scenario that cannot be verified. All we can say looking
forward from this point is that the high priest who looked the other way while the only
male was eliminated by an angel of some God won all the marbles in the end.
It is clear to me that both Mutemweya and the high priest had sinister plans of their
own. Mutemweya was in a position to win by simply talking to God that is indicated
by the Bible with the assertion that the king ordered the beheading of John the Baptist.
The king was the biological father of John and the record says he loved him dearly. So
the scene is this. Able is dead and it's time for God to punish Cain. Amenophis IV was
anointed and immediately began kicking and screaming to have her city to her heavenly
father built. Mutemweya was the power that was and agreed. Amenophis III was
reported to the world as incapacitated and near death. The scene was set for
Mutemweya to continue to run the government such as it was.
Running the government of ancient Egypt meant having the power to determine what
would be spent doing whatever. So it was technically Mutemweya who decided to
build Akhetaten, palace of the sun. We can be sure she had all the help possible from
the new co regent, Amenophis IV who's idea it was most probably. All the problems
with the protocol were solved including the labor source by using foreign labor to skirt
the first commandment. Alls well that ends well. At this point the end is no where in
sight.
The workers were assembled at Thebes and an overall supervisor put in charge of
them. He too looks a lot like Moses for it is he and not Amenophis IV who led the 12
tribes to the wilderness to build the tabernacle. He can easily be credited with such
miraculous acts as parting the waters of the Sea of Reeds for it was he who did the
leading of the chosen people of God that had a covenant with God, Amenophis IV.
What was that covenant? These were non Egyptians that were not qualified to work
on Pharaoh's grand palace, timeless memorials and magnificent tomb which is exactly
what they are now up to. Did this not mean that they were thereby qualified to enter
into the kingdom of God, both this world and the next? That tells us they were not
conscripts salves if you must but willing volunteers. The Bible says so too. Moses
didn't have to drag the Israelites to the desert. They came running according to it.
It is absolutely necessary to get the religion of ancient Egypt clear in one's mind to
understand what took place and why. There are three judgments of God, Pharaoh.
Documentation tells us all about numbers 2 and 3, the judgment of soul and standing
before the great judgment seat of God. What was implied knowledge, all knew was
the first judgment of God, race in simple terms. Only Egyptians were qualified to enter
the NEXT kingdom of God in the NEXT life. This accounts for the fanatical grabbing at
the Bible as the word of God. Jesus, Amenophis IV was about the business of
integrating all nations into the kingdom of God. This manifests itself today in the
notion of race changing baptism bringing foreigners, non Christians into the flock of
Jesus. Baptism removed the sin of origin for Amenophis IV, not firstborn son of God.
Foreigners building Akhetaten tells us that Amenophis III was still alive. Working on
Pharaoh's projects was paying the toll to get into the NEXT life. The big buffalo
Pharaoh had over the people was that he controlled entry into the NEXT life. Thus it
would be sacrilege with guaranteed condemnation to hell, (fed to EATER) for an
Egyptian to work for Amenophis IV. I consider figuring this out to be the breaking point
of the hoax for me. The one thing that is absolutely certain about the Egyptian
megaliths, all except Akhetaten is that they were built exclusively by Egyptians, back
breaking and life threatening labor while slaves worked in the fields, a much better
place to work than a quarry.
Those Israelites led by the big boss left Thebes and headed north along the Nile river
to a place on the east bank of the river. Today that place is known as El Amarna but
at the time no one lived there and for a very good reason. There was no life support.
It was on the wrong side of the river nestled in a large cove surrounded on three sides
by cliffs with the river completing it's isolation. In that region of the Nile, the river is
bounded on the east by cliffs that meander away from the river for a few miles and
then back again. El Amarna is located in the area marked off by a combination of the
cliffs and the Nile river. The only way into the place was across the Nile. So getting
supplies including and especially water was a significant problem. Lucky God was on
their side and in a miracle performing mood. What appears in the Bible as miracles
was probably sarcastic statements made by those who had to do the work like, "where
do we get water, out of a rock" and "how are we supposed to get stuff over there part
the waters and take it across in these ox carts?"
What really happened? Amenophis IV was kicking and screaming to get to the place
of her birth, build her father a palace and get him down out of the sky so she could lay
some of that baby girl sugar on her daddy. The Tower of Babble author got the part
about reaching the whereabouts of God correct, in the sky. And the fact that the
purpose of Akhetaten was to get God out of the sky and into a palace like God
deserves was not understood. It wasn't getting up to God but getting God down.
The record says that Amenophis IV couldn't wait. Soon after the waters were parted
and the work had begun she chased right after the Israelites and discovered the
difficulties in getting across the Sea of Reeds first hand. But get across she did,
miracles required or otherwise. She lived in a tent and mingled with the workers just
like the sacred scriptures indicate that Jesus did.
As one can imagine there were a few rough edges none the least of which were
shortages of food and water to feed God's chosen people. To ease communications
and try to clear up some of the confusion of tongues a liaison, disciple was chosen by
each tribe to communicate directly with headquarters, a tent where the son of God
lived while her palace was being built. These twelve appear in the scriptures as
Apostles. One of the first problems addressed was how the workers would be fed.
Thus the Our Father in question form, "Lord teach us to pray." Repeat after me, "Give
us this day our daily bread" but only after you have buttered Him all up acknowledging
His kingdom come and that His will shall be done on earth as it is in the sky where He
lives. I thought God lived on a mountain and only flew around the sky.
We can certainly appreciate the confusion that must have been in the minds of the
workers as to just exactly who, what and even why God was. And if you can grasp
that just a little then you must have apathy for the poor Greek philosopher trying to
make the same decision a thousand years later. I believe we are at the threshold of
Trinity God, a cheap solution.
The notion of "give us this day our daily bread" is as ancient Egyptian as it gets. Again
we find a unique of recorded history where workers on God's grand palaces, timeless
memorials and magnificent tomb were put in line at the end of the work day to get their
daily bread. So when we find Jesus teaching His disciples to act like Egyptians we
know there is a strong connection between Jesus and Egypt.
The old testament is the actions repeated time after time with new players now and
again while the new testament is basically philosophy. The Sermon on the Mount is a
collection of just about everything one philosopher could find in the way of the
philosophy of Amenophis IV who was a prolific writer that never wrote a word herself
but only dictated her thoughts to scribes. The heart of the new testament is the
Gospels that tell us right away there were differences of opinion about what Jesus
actually said. The 4 that were selected out of a set of a dozen or more for the Bible
were picked for the nearness of the opinions of their authors. There was a golden
opportunity to inject personal opinions about how people should live. What is
remarkable is how the old and new testaments differ in some opinions. Not only did
Amenophis walk among the common class building her father's palace but she
preached to them too. Her sin of origin was washed away and so could their's be.
The building of Akhetaten was proceeding when suddenly Mutemweya crashed, died.
The easiest thing to overlook in the big picture is who paid for all that work. But of
course it was paid for by the same people who pay for everything governments do, the
tax payers. Where did the daily bread come from to feed the workers be they slaves
or actually God's chosen? The answer is so obvious and so overlooked by scholars
that the question is rarely if ever asked. That brings us back to the power that was,
Mutemweya who's approval was necessary to fix a flat chariot tire. If she had not
wanted Akhetaten to be built it would not have been built.
Akhetaten was an integral part of her overall plan for a takeover by women of the
kingdom of God. There is zero doubt of that in my mind because she had the power to
stop it. What is more evident is the fact that Amenophis III is still alive. He has been
on ice but things keep well in refrigerators. So what we need to come to grips with is
what the landscape looked like with Mutemweya out of the high priest's way. Only little
David, Tiye is left to fight God's battles. The strategy of a peasant queen was given
the test and of course she failed miserably. If you don't understand that to be the
record then let me direct your attention to the Bible. Did David really flee from Saul?
Why? Did Saul end up catching up with David? Did Saul allow a competing king of
Israel? Saul was a sweetheart but the high priest applied the law of God.
We can expect the high priest visited Mutemweya's grave often just to make sure she
was really dead. I detected a nervous condition about him that can easily be explained
by years of dodging her. That sort of thing does not go away quickly. Without
Mutemweya his agenda could be put into place and he did but not with reckless
abandon.
He took a page out of Mutemweya's play book, went into the room where God was
resting and upon returning announced to the court, "I spoke to God and God said that I
must take charge here." Highly unusual, don't you think? Odd how all speakers to God
hear exactly the same thing in a manner of speaking. God never tells anyone anything
that they don't want to hear and that is especially true when it's God representatives
doing the speaking to God. Will the speaking to God never end?
The first thing the high priest needed to accomplish was an end to the, "money down a
rat hole" called Akhetaten. His first effort along that line was to cut off the supplies.
Nothing is simple as we know and that wasn't either. There was a 10,000 man strong
force of Egyptian regulars stationed at Akhetaten for the purpose of guarding the co
regent. He could not cut off their supplies. Again we get a big Biblical hit. The
Israelites ran out of food in the desert and God fed them manna. What's manna? Why
that's Egyptian army rations as in, "give us this day our daily bread." Amenophis IV
was reduced to eating with the troops. Isn't that a shame. They killed a quail.
Amenophis IV struck back. She attempted to fire the high priest. When that failed to
get supplies restored she took her palace guard and vandalized the temples knocking
noses off of the gods and so on. This is the first case of throwing the money changers
out of the temple of God. Of course the other one was executed by Jesus, one of just
a couple of action items in the Gospels. Philosophy is easy to disguise while actions
are not. Actions are not arguable while philosophy is nothing but argument.
We can say that terminated diplomacy ending any doubt that Amenophis IV would have
a sudden change of mind and just give the whole idea up. She could have had a very
cushy life back at the palace but then maybe not. Resistance may have been her only
option. Knocking noses off gods cannot be tolerated you know.
So the high priest went into the room where God was and this time when he returned
to court God was with him. By now the alcohol had erased what little mind Amenophis
III had to begin with making him just a puppet in the high priest's hands.
While Amenophis IV was holed up at Akhetaten, the high priest loaded Amenophis III
onto the royal yacht for a little cruse on the river. Along the river's bank came the
regular Egyptian army. When they arrived at Akhetaten the soldiers called across the
river to their brother at arms to make ready for the coming of God. With that all
resistance that never began ended. People shouted and the walls tumbled down.
Akhetaten is a natural fortress with inverted walls on three sides and a nice mote, the
Nile on the remaining. The rest of the Jericho scenario is there as well. Amenophis III
was carried on an arc which is a litter of a sorts. Every living thing was not killed but
left immediately there after because there is no life support. All the valuables were
collected and brought to the treasury of the Lord God, Amenophis III. They saved the
whore house according to the Bible which was someone looking at the harem, a string
of naked women leaving the great city.
According to the Bible the builders of Babel scattered to the 4 winds. We know the
builders of Akhetaten left after this if they had not already gone.
They didn't miss by much. They mistook which son of God actually made the entry
into the great city. That God was Amenophis III and not Amenophis IV as stated in
the Gospels. All else is the same. The crowds cheered and waved palm branches
and the son of God didn't walk either. He was carried on the arc of the covenant no
doubt. Arcs were for dead Pharaohs. You don't suppose the high priest brought a
dead Pharaoh along do you? He did everything is says in the Gospels so maybe.
Jesus was arrested by soldiers under the command of the high priest and so was
Amenophis IV. The actual authority, Amenophis III washed his hands of the whole
sorted mess just like Pontious Pilot leaving the fate of the accused to the high priest.
And, just like the Gospels tell us, Amenophis IV was stripped naked in public, ridiculed,
beaten and eventually condemned to hell. What was her great sin? She was a
woman. But she was not the only sinful woman lurking about. There were two others,
Tiye and Nefertiti. Sure enough, the jury of one convicted them all and sentenced them
to hell. Nefertiti is the famous queen, wife of Amenophis IV, woman with a wife.
The above picture is a remake of graffiti left on the walls at Akhetaten. The maker was
not thinking crucifixion but rather "death on the cross" with the pole making the bar of
the cross. This is standard practice for the Egyptians. It was an overt condemnation to
hell, an expression of pure hate for people who needed to be taken completely out of
existence never to be seen or heard from again. Since the Bible says that Jesus, the
central figure, Amenophis IV came back to life after descending into hell we can say
that it didn't always work as advertised. It takes 3 hours to die this way.
Soldiers running away from the battle fire over their shoulders. We can expect that by
accident a bullet finds a target. The Gospels tell us that Jesus spooked His accusers.
While Amenophis IV stood with the pole through her gut she threatened the high priest
claiming that she was truly the son of God and that she was coming back to earth with
the heavenly host led by Michael no doubt and do some really bad things to him. Such
as human nature is, curses even though readily discountable are nevertheless often
taken seriously. They give a person a certain feeling of being violated by invisible
forces. This was the case for the high priest and it manifests itself in what he did.
The Egyptian protocol called for the treasure to be put into Pharaoh's grave but not left
there. The treasure of Jericho went to God's treasury, Pharaoh's. Where did it go
from there? Try into the tomb of king Tutankhamen. That's why the treasure was still
there. It was cursed by Amenophis IV and as everyone knows curses never go away.
The high priest who becomes known as Ramses I executed his plan to "Conquer
Israel" by finishing off the previous dynasty and starting his own. In that interest king
Tutankhamen known as the boy king died young paving the way. Mutemweya was
technically working for the one who captured the crown of Egypt even though she never
knew it no doubt. But he who won that giant prize,the office of God was spooked still
by the curse of Amenophis IV and got rid of the tainted treasure in the king's tomb,
sealed it up and left it. The death mask has markings saying it was made originally for
Amenophis IV. Is it cursed, meaning what?
Once one knows the Egyptian protocol that states the king and queen are the spiritual
parents of the entire human race then the fact that they are all Adams and Eves is
clear. Our search is for the particular Eve of the Bible, originator of original sin.
There is no clear definition of just what sin original sin is per say. What we can say
with great certainty is the serpent that tempted Eve in the garden of Eden was the
golden cobra she put on her bonnet. Since there were several ladies that did that we
must find further evidence to actually identify Eve. The big clue is the assertion that
she was ejected from the garden because of what the serpent tempted her to do,
make herself like unto God. Noticing that the word Pharaoh means God we get a
perfect fit with Amenophis IV. Not only with her taking up poisonous serpents but the
fact that she left Egypt according to one account of what the writings said, Exodus.
And at least one of those who attempted to read the writing on the wall said her going
to build Akhetaten was punishment. That was the tale of Cain killing Able. So we get
clues to the actual Biblical usage of some words. Pharaoh means God. Eden is
Egypt. Sin of course is the breaking of God's rules and a woman becoming like unto
God is a sin. Ordinarily, origin would imply ancestry and we get a clouded view of her
ancestry too. We know that her mother was at least a commoner. Dynasties are
ancestry based so that could be original sin. Since we also know that baptism
removes original sin and it brings the baptized into a new race, those qualified to enter
the kingdom of God then it must have been her ancestry the author had in mind.
Amenophis IV did everything Eve did and was even of faulty ancestry.
What is abundantly clear is the high priest that crucified Amenophis IV did not himself
believe that there was a road block between this life and the next where the
condemned would be intercepted and physically removed from existence. That is not
absolute but is readily verifiable by the fact that the papacy employed burning at the
stake in the identical scenario throughout the early days of modern Christianity and on
through the Reformation the Salem witch trials being a stellar example with "ordeals"
and hangings. The fact is that the Book of the Dead had a beginning like everything
else. It's kind of telltale to see it appear with Satan the "accuser" shortly after
Amenophis IV. The trashing of God's helper, Satan and lumping him in with Lucifer the
fallen angel by modern evangelicals is a clue all in it's own no doubt. Is that the
product of ignorance or larceny?
The story of the invention of hell is a good one itself and is the basis for all hell based
modern religions as well. I have that story extracted from the sands of Egypt. It's not
on this web site. I found it in ancient Egypt, the "Scorpion King" invented hell.
The word like all others had a beginning. What does it mean? When we see the high
priest that captured the kingdom of God give himself the title, Ramses meaning
conquerer of Israel we know that must be a significant clue. We can say that
Akhetaten is Israel because he clearly captured it. We can also say that Egypt is
Israel and the Bible stammers it's way in that direction. He clearly captured the crown
of Egypt when the dynasty collapsed with the death of king Tutankhamen. When we
apply the math, write the equations and solve for this unknown the answer is, an
Israelite is anyone who builds. It may mean a special builder of houses of worship.
Therefore the Egyptians are prolific Israelites along with the Aztecs, Mayans, Incas,
and even ants that are all known for building. Was Amenophis IV fathered by
Amenophis III, a builder and thus a carpenter?
That's a clue. Jesus was the son of St Joseph, a carpenter. The Gospels clearly say
that he, St Joseph, (Amenophis III) was NOT the father of Jesus. Carpenters are
builders. If Jews are Israelites then that means they build. Do they? Who in history
didn't? The tabernacle in the desert built by Moses makes Moses an Israelite. Jews
believe that Moses was one of their own. Did Jews participate in the building of
Akhetaten? One can hardly leave them out. They are the closest non Egyptians to the
place. Did Jews originate the Bible? They certainly didn't do the new testament did
they? That much we can say for sure.
When hoaxing takes place everyone and anyone is a victim. The fellow with a sheet
over his head in the graveyard doesn't check his victims to see what their faith is first
before going boo. The originator of the canon is a matter of history and the work of
Constantine the great. Great what? A great many things none the least of which is
well documented, the fact that he continued a 300 year effort to eliminate Jews from
the face of the earth. The notion that there were Jews in his church is as ridiculous as
Jews in the third Reich or black, Jewish and Catholic members of the KKK. It is
perfectly clear that Constantine overtly tagged the Jews as Christ killers to give the
KKK something to guide them. Unless of course Ramses one was a Jew and even then
"they" didn't do it, he, Constantine did.
Misunderstandings can be planned. Doing that is called hoaxing. The individual with
the sheet over his head in the graveyard plans to cause people to misunderstand, think
they are seeing a ghost. The book says that out of a population there will be those
that will forever insist they saw a real ghost having seen him or not. They will embellish
what was seen and come up with proof positive it was a ghost. It was seen several
feet in the air, was transparent, could see right through it and so on. Therefore
convincing them that it was not a real ghost they saw is impossible even if the man who
did it confesses. That must have roots somewhere in the human psyche. This is not
new to the human race.
Is there a benefit to seeing a ghost? But of course there is. Everyone didn't see it so
the ones that did suddenly become minor celebrates. They get interviewed by the
reporter who will write an article that sells newspapers and get their names in the
paper. The bottom line is that the hoax will have many friends, boosters and
supporters. Not only that it will put the truth to all that nonsense put forward by those
who claim there is no such thing as ghosts and therefore silence critics. Ghosts are
real aren't they?
No one has a vested interest in putting the truth to the hoax while the multitudes have
every incentive to believe it. Is that not the case with the Bible? What profit is there in
debunking it? Is there any profit in using it? Do the bears go potty in the woods? The
most significant lie in the Bible, innocent or not so innocent is hell. Pharaoh created
hell, a documented fact. I think I got it. Jews created the Bible and left hell out so
somebody had to correct the mistake with a new testament. The question I have been
unable to answer is how did Jews get involved in the first place. I cant seem to get
away from noticing that it was constructed from scattered and not necessarily related
documents compiled and heavily edited by Constantine's early Christians that glued
them together with bubble gum and bailing wire riggings. The very human need to
believe gives life to the Bible. Since I have the unmitigated gall to say the Bible is a
hoax I am in that extremely small minority, the ones who must be shown to be just
some old non believers. But I too can reap great rewards based not upon my logic but
their's. Let me say it like this. If prayer is beneficial and brings great rewards then I
must have high expectations. I believe I'm the most prayed for person of all time. Of
100,000 ministers the common reply was, "I'm praying for you." It's at a time like this I
must express sorrow that what I have found is so, for that dashes my hopes of getting
all the great rewards prayer brings. Imagine, if only the sun could talk.
The bodies of both Amenophis IV and her queen Nefertiti have not been found
according to some archaeologists. One group has announced the identification of
Nefertiti but the body of Amenophis IV still remains missing. Is that because we are
insisting on finding a male? The casket prepared for Amenophis IV was used for her
burial but it was mutilated with the male name removed and no new name put in it's
place. Such a casket has been found. The body inside was that of a female. It is my
opinion that the body of another female is that of Nefertiti. That is disputed by many.
However, the mummy in question has the markings of one who was executed by
pole-through-gut condemnation to hell. The bottom line is the established fact that the
Egyptians tried to erase the entire reign of the odd couple that was two women with
one, Amenophis IV masquerading as a male. Let us note that there is a chance that
one or both of their bodies were discarded by Ramses I although this is highly unlikely.
His most politically expedient move was to give them state funerals and not even
mention that they had been executed. Mutilation of the casket would have been done
as a matter of correctness, absolutely necessary for proper rebirth in the next life
perhaps. Identification of the body in the mutilated casket can be done in a negative
sense by DNA analysis. Both the bodies of the mother of Amenophis IV, Tiye and
Amenophis III are identified. DNA could tell us if the f