Memorized and believed lies makes the student more ignorant.
Copyright 2006 by William Edward Hunt
All rights reserved
I met a few people while waiting for airplanes. I listened while they talked and took mental notes.
The following is a sample of perhaps hundreds. These two have probably done more to shape
my thinking on the subject of negative education than all the rest combined.
I did a lot of business traveling and can't remember for sure where these conversations took
place. I think this happened in Chicago. This weary traveler like me was a bit disgruntled by an
extended wait for his flight out. We struck up a conversation that was an eye opener for me. He
had another reason to be disgruntled.
The first thing I remember was how disillusioned he was. He had come from a meeting where a
recent "digging" was discussed. "They insisted I tell them about their culture and especially their
religion and all I had was some charcoal from their camp fire and a few pieces of broken pottery"
is how I remember his complaint. Then he discovered that I was a computer engineer.
"Oh no" was my response to the obvious question. "Computers can do nothing people can't do.
Computers are best described as rapid idiots. They don't know anything people don't tell them
and can't calculate anything a person can't calculate." And then I followed with the totally
unbelievable for the day, the 1960s, "computers don't make mistakes." At the time every screw
up in government in particular and everywhere else they had computers was explained away and
accepted by an ignorant population as, "the computer made a mistake."
The bottom line is simple I explained. If he has a rule then the rule can be programmed and the
program will apply the rule thousands of times faster than a person and with absolute accuracy.
He understood. The first step is analysis, formulate the problem. With luck, formulas that are
simple enough to do by hand or in one's head, we won't even need a computer. So we
shortened considerably the otherwise boring wait working on potential formulas for determining
what had happened many thousands of years ago. I never saw or heard from him again and
don't even remember his name. I'll bet he remembers that conversation.
about his findings else his funds will be cut off and he can take up truck driving. Those
are not my words but his. I've been around government work, done a bit of it, enough
to know that lying is a major part of getting funded. Public education is government
work. It's not lying, it's just political? Are private, parochial schools better than public
schools? Do they teach the absolute, WORD OF GOD truths as parochial school?
He claimed to hold a PhD in Physics. I was impressed by how many physical laws he had
memorized and in particular Thermodynamics. But there was an obvious problem. The topic
was space navigation, a subject at which I had a great deal of experience. Why mid course
corrections? Because every particle in the universe exerts a force on my space ship and in
order to compute the force experienced at any moment I must take that into account else my
computation is in error. I can't account for every particle in the universe for a variety of reasons
and even if I could the computation would take forever using the fastest computer. However, I
have a new formula for doing the computation that would allow it to be done. I got it from space
aliens, my usual reply to, "where did you READ that." Is analysis dead?
That was the last words I was allowed to speak. From that point forward the conversation
became very one sided with me just listening. He had a PhD in Physics. He knew all natural
laws, had them on quick recall and "it is impossible." I was told to read this book and that book
where the authors were absolutely sure "it is impossible." They weren't Physics books. As best I
could make out they were proofs that God created the universe based upon the "accepted"
consensus of opinion of top caliber professors at the government funded divinity university.
What's his bottom line? All is known. We can now memorize all that knowledge. Anyone who
dares to question will or at least should be dragged to the public square, flogged and then
burned at the stake. Is your preacher a physicist? Does he know everything?
training in science. He claimed to be a physicist because that was popular at the time,
the "bomb" was the latest high tech. He had memorized the laws of thermodynamics
and used them on people like me to prove he was for real. But then he resorted to all
that logic and reasoning that is telltale of con men. Sorry, meant to say ministers.
Cambridge, no institution is exempt. Why? Because they one and all accept expert
opinions as facts. There is the need to question, repeat the proof, get other opinions
and reexamine the evidence. That is sorely lacking in today's education, in my opinion
of course. A few examples where a little common sense would go a long way follows.
my lifetime I've witnessed the word "soul" change meaning and no one, higher
education and especially the religious authorities have a single protest.
SOUL - RECORD OF ONE'S SINS
That's all it used to be, 1950. Now it's a spirit that goes to la la land for the righteous
and hell for the wrongeous. That's not to leave out that it's become a variety of food,
any two black males and God knows what else.
CHANGING THE MEANING OF IMPORTANT WORDS IS NOT CONSERVATIVE!!!
Greek mythology is a subject all in itself. We memorize opinions about what the Greeks conjured
about supernatural beings, gods. Yes, opinions. They're without basis in fact and make the
ancient Greeks look like a pack of superstitious dummies. That's done without asking the
simplest questions. Where did they, the Greeks or anyone get their big ideas? Did they muse at
the ceiling, drink a lot of cheap wine or breathe the gases at Delphi? Of course not.
The Greeks were great engineers, philosophers, scientists, artists and much more. They used
their knowledge to theorize the gods. The gods are based upon sound scientific principles as
they understood them to be. The problem is they didn't have sufficient scientific knowledge or
there would have been no Greek mythology to study, lies to memorize. They pushed the
envelope of knowledge to their ability and, like us thought they knew everything. They didn't.
Did some dumb Greek hold his wet finger in the wind and say he felt the presence of god the
way preachers talk about God? Of course not. A brilliant Greek with false science is
responsible for the birth or Athena. Of course Athena always was and always will be. We're
talking about the discovery of Athena and not the invention. Athena is for real isn't She?
If we begin with Athena already being discovered it's very difficult to work backwards to the
discovery. It's the old punch line, "you can't get there from here, you got to go somewhere else
to start." We can't begin with Athena to get to the birth of Athena, we got to go somewhere else
to start. Where is somewhere else? Their science of course. What else did they think they
knew? What did their philosophers think about other things? How about life itself?
The Greeks didn't experiment on a formal basis. Proof by experimentation was not on their
requirements for proof list. Nevertheless they did not just pull stuff out of the air and declare it to
be so. They argued the case and their arguments were accepted. What case did they argue
first before arguing that Athena was for real? Had they experimented and maybe they did in this
case they would have held someone's nose and mouth closed until he/she expired.
Athena is the "giver of life." That is also the description of the third member of the Holy Trinity
God of Christians, the Holy Ghost recently changed to the Holy Spirit. Our bodies are temples of
the Holy Spirit. When a person dies the Spirit leaves the body. What spirit is that anyhow? The
wind of course. Dead people stop breathing. The spirit, the wind leaves and that is the cause of
death. Athena, the giver of life has decided the person must die and no longer enters the body.
The air mass has a brain, thinks, decides? God decides who shall live and who must die. Of
course said the Greek philosopher.
What does it mean to be dead? Are rocks dead or alive? How can we tell? Can we find a rule
that applies to all things that will tell us their condition, dead or alive? If I have two things, one
dead and one alive how can I tell which is which? What is the number one compelling
characteristic, the common thread of all living things?
If it's alive it moves. Well, dead things move too but not under their own power. So the most
general rule says, if it moves under it's own power then it's alive. All things that cannot
move under their own power are dead. When a living thing is deprived of Athena, the giver
of life the thing dies. Can we take that undeniable logic one step further?
There are no living things at all except God of course. We are all dead, temporarily alive at
God's pleasure. It's God, Athena that's alive. Athena enters our otherwise statue bodies and
brings them to life. On the sixth day God fashioned a statue out of clay and breathed life into it.
God is the giver of life. That's the Holy Spirit God of course. There's more than one God?
and the a male baby sprouted out. Then a female one. From that interesting tidbit comes the
ancient Egyptian theory of reproduction, Women are dirt where men plant people seeds. In
the case of the Romans God planted the people seeds, semen in the belly of a bitch wolf telling
us that women are just convenient, not necessary. In all three civilizations, Egyptian, Greek and
Roman the little children were required to memorize the lies, become more ignorant than at birth.
When a person is deprived of air the person becomes dead. Dead people express no wisdom or
knowledge. The distinguishing characteristic of life can be upgraded. Not only do living things
move under their own power but they have wisdom and knowledge. Well, God loves some folks
more than others and some creatures more than others, living things with the Holy Spirit installed
like horses and sheep. But they all become statues, stiffs, when the Spirit departs their bodies
and Athena the goddess of wisdom no longer resides therein.
No! This is not about Paul Hogan's description of American beer. It's about gods. Gods have
no bodies at all. They're pure spirits, bodiless beings that are responsible for life itself. And the
Holy Spirit, the wind is a prime example. The invisible god, the wind pushes the obviously dead
sail boat over the water. That's why we pray to the wind when there's a big sea battle.
I'm sure the average person isn't familiar with Newton's law, Force is Mass times Acceleration.
Of course pushing on anything and getting it to move is work and Works is Force times
Distance moved. Combining the two we get, Work is Mass times Acceleration times
Distance moved. Thus the wind does work when it pushes on the sail causing the boat to move
and by Newton's law must have a mass, a body. How much different would the world be if only
the Greeks had determined that the wind had mass, a body?
This is the source of invisible God that is everywhere present that is almighty and all things to
everyone. The first memorized and accepted as absolute, word of God fact is the lie, the wind
has no body. From that master link springs the chain reaction, the weapon of mass social
destruction that leads us to where we now reside, lies memorized as truths used to promote the
agendas of liars.
The ancient Greeks felt God no doubt but only after God had been proved to exist. God did not
come from feelings but rather false science. Today it is argued, look about you. Where did all
this come from? There must be a God. That's what the average student of ancient history
brings to the class room. It's no gap at all to jump to simply say the ancient Greeks looked about
themselves, asked where all this came from and drew the same conclusion. It's not so.
If it's Greek gods you seek then you will find them in Greek science. They make perfect sense
given the accepted scientific facts as they understood them. The most compelling false fact of
their science is that the air has no mass, no body, does not occupy space or weigh anything.
That's a lie of course and lies learned and accepted as so are negative educators.
Once the lie has been accepted as the truth then all the little children must memorize it. The little
children are worse off than if they had no education at all, more ignorant than before they began
studying, memorizing and parroting the accepted truths back like a tape recorder.
All is known. All that is known is written down. Therefore if something is said that you haven't
ever heard before then ask the speaker where he/she read that. Makes sense. There's nothing
new under the sun so be extremely careful when noticing something that is not commonly known.
I usually rely on space aliens as my source in such cases.
What about the case of misread documents? Has someone, an expert read and interpreted the
document already? Does that shut out all other readers? If it does then there should be but one
Christian, Muslim or even Jewish faith. All three rely on the reading and interpreting of a so
called ancient document known as the Bible. The difference between any two of the thousands
of faiths is the reading and interpreting of the Bible. Kind of like fingerprints, no two alike yet all
the same, faith in God. Faith in God or faith the Bible is God's word?
What about other ancient documents? Are they final read and interpreted? Is there even the
slightest possibility that the reader/interpreter got it a little cockeyed? What if the person just
happens to be a doctor, hold a PhD in ancient studies from big name university? Do they ever
get it wrong? Is it a matter of who do you believe, have faith in?
cottage industry of guessing the whereabouts of the lost continent of Atlantis now
exists. Are they all wrong with their guessing? Why are they guessing anyhow?
Above, the plat on the left comes from my deluxe Bible, The New American Bible. I simply
noticed that the land of the dead lies beneath the flat earth. And the earth is surrounded by
oceans with the water line being at the bottom of the earth and above the land of the dead.
Where did the idea that there was a continent called Atlantis come from anyhow? But of course,
it came from ancient Egypt. There's at least one PhD of Egyptology that says he believes the
pyramids were built by those advanced folks from Atlantis. You know, he's probably correct.
Those advanced pyramid builders one and all ended up in Sheol, the Netherworld, land of the
dead. Atlantis is not where they came from but where they went. Just their spirits, souls?
Would you believe a soul is a clay tablet invented 5,000 years ago by the ancient Egyptians to
record the sins of their dead? Do you believe the lie, souls go to heaven? Are souls spirits?
The ancient Greeks said the earth was surrounded by oceans. The ancient Egyptians did not
say the earth was surrounded by anything. To the Egyptians the earth was a flat plate
suspended in space with an infinite set of similar flat plates beneath. The above map of the
universe originated in ancient Egypt and did not indicate an ocean surrounding the earth.
The original photograph, (wink) of the universe pictured above, annotated in English and
typewritten comes from my Bible and advertised to be the work of ancient Hebrews. You know,
the Hebrew part is probably correct to a great extent. A Hebrew is an ancient Egyptian woman
that pretends to be a man so she can be Pharaoh or something like that. Woman for sure. I
know I'm not supposed to but I read those ancient documents anyhow. How disrespectful.
But where did this photograph of the universe come from? How did the ancient Greeks get it in
the first place to say it was Hebrew? Did they read it correctly? Has it been final read? Did the
Greeks know what a Hebrew was? How about you? You think a Hebrew is a Jew. No?
The map of the universe originated in ancient Egypt. It shows multiple lands of the dead and
indicates an infinite set of them. The church worked on the picture ever so slightly in an effort to
make it conform to the words of the Bible. But it's African and not Asian as advertised.
The notion of the lost continent of Atlantis was brought to Greece from Egypt. That story is
probably mostly correct since Solon got it from an Egyptian priest. The Greek writing about
Atlantis was done by third parties so we know how accurate that is likely to be. In other words,
Solon got it cockeyed, brought that to Aristotle or Socrates and they improved on it. That's
compounding the false information. But once it's read it's read and that's that. Just like, "God
said it, I believe it and that's that." No new information will be accepted by the authorities.
When all is known then all that is left for the children to do is learn it. The ones who learn it well
will become leaders. They will be put in charge of the learning. From time to time they will hold
ceremonies and award each other degrees, statements of how well they learned all the truths.
Their word will be without question. They know everything. Their word is their badge of honor.
During my college career some professors encouraged their students to think for themselves,
question all those undeniable truths. That was a while back. I guess the world has changed.
Now it's get ahead, MBA and straight to Wall Street with the 7 digit salary, captain of industry.
The big bucks go the those who lead others to hell. The road to hell is paved with undeniable
truths. Who thought up the idea of hell and why did he, (it was a man for sure) do it.
The first thing to do is notice that everyone believes, has faith in the same set of lies, sorry,
meant to say the same God. The only difference in one faith and the other is the details of what
God wants everyone to do and not do. There's a least common denominator, the Bible. It's just
how one preacher interprets it compared to others. They're all real close to each other.
Then there's the great benefit of ecumenical, religion can run the world.
than before he/she began to learn. It's been going on a very long time.
according to the experts, the ones that final read it. According to them one of the Pharaoh's was
really superstitious and had a lot of charms, hex sort of things buried with his mummified body.
When the experts say it then it's absolutely so. Only an idiot questions the experts.
It serves as a prime example of how those without the proper expertise misread ancient
documents. Is the crane headed humanoid is Satan. How ridiculous. The authorities changed
the Devil to Satan at least 100 years ago. Or was that the other way around in reverse.
Whatever they did to Satan it happened gradually. You know, like things evolving, slowly
changing over time. So there's no need to question what the experts say ever.
And, I have the nerve to say Satan has your soul in his grubby hands. What's even more
ridiculous, I say that souls are clay tablets like the ancient Egyptians wrote on when everyone
knows souls are spirits, not even made out of matter. The authorities deemed souls to be spirits
at least 30 years ago, final, terminal. That was just after they changed ghosts to spirits. Souls
are records so spirits can be written on. That thing, ah, no not Satan, ah, god has in his hand
must be a spirit and the scribe in his other hand is to poke it. It's alive you know.
Yep, the experts know all about this document, what it says and their word is final. But since I've
already stepped into the quick sand, a candidate for burning at the stake I think I'll mention just
one more little thing about this document.
No, the experts got it wrong again. It's not about a superstitious Pharaoh. It's a catechism, a
book used to teach religion, terrorize the little children threatening them with being fed to that
monster, Eater for doing and not doing as Pharaoh dictated. And there were a lot of these
books. They had to be made by hand so only the better class of people could afford them.
Just like religion today the undeniable truths changed real often. This particular description of
what happens to dead people used to terrorize Egyptian children is the version invented by the
Hebrew Pharaoh, Amenophis IV. And it reflects the important differences between Judaism and
Christianity. See how dumb it is to reread final read documents.
Let's just look at it and see if it rings any bells for those Doctors of Divinity, the ones who know
the sacred scriptures as well as they know their own Swiss bank account numbers. Swiss bank
not necessary for no accounting, tax free, tax deductible and tax exempt. Sorry, my mistake.
Let's take this document apart and see if it fits the Bible's version of creation.
experts in Egyptology have misread this document, writing on the wall but that they are not the
only ones to try reading it. I fully expect the story of creation including the notion of a Messiah
came from the misreading of this document. That's the one appearing in the Bible. In addition I
believe the notion of Trinity God comes from here as well. This is not to deny either the
possibility of other similar writings being the actual basis or at least others contributing.
artist surrounded it with the symbol of God, the snake, asp in particular. Holes can't be seen you
know, only the material surrounding them. A hole in space can't be seen at all. Note that this is
the sky. That's all there was before Holy God created everything. Can you look at this and
conjure the first 5 day of creation? I can and I believe someone(s) did, the version in the Bible.
a ton of information that appears in the Bible from this line. Left to right we have Eve and Adam
who immediately worshiped God. Then there's Holy God. Seated behind Holy God is the
promise of a Messiah. We'll look at that next. Behind the Messiah symbol is three divine
persons representative of Holy God's three natures. Other tidbits for other books of the Bible
are also on this line including man's authority over God's creations and God authorizing kings to
rule. Kings have all earthly power including the right, duty and obligation to enslave.
Notice the figure seated directly behind Holy God. What's the common thread?
comes from the tomb while
the one on the right from
the book of the dead.
Having two documents we
can do simultaneous
equations and deduce two
unknowns.
Father as I was taught while still a child. What's the difference between one and the other? The
figure on the left has feathers on it's hat while the one on the right has the snake, asp. The
feather says that this is only a symbolic representative of what it is and not the real thing. On the
sixth day God promised a Messiah, "His" son to save the world He had just created. That was
then. The figure on the right is the Messiah that Holy God promised. And that individual was
definitely the son of Holy God but born of woman. On the sixth day woman had just been
created so the Messiah, born of woman must come later, after the creation of man and woman.
Well, women have nothing to do with the child other than incubator. Therefore the son of God is
pure God while the mother of God gets the detail. The virgin Mary was NOT God.
in these pictures what I had been taught with one little difference. The Messiah was
promised by Holy God when Adam and Eve were thrown out of Paradise.
warmed over, barfed on version of the real McCoy above. I don't believe what these
document say but as an American I honor other's right to be stupid. However, I resent
being taxed to keep them in business, the business of selling tickets to this heaven
enhanced by threatening people, little children even with the terror max, the fires of
hell, tax free, tax exempt, tax deductible without any public accounting. Religion is
definitely not free because I have to pay their taxes terrorized by hell or not.
summer time and the living is always easy in Paradise. That's what it says. And look at all those
fruit trees. Notice the tree that's right there in the center of the garden. Is that an apple tree?
but history none the less, the history of an earlier hoaxer, the first ever in recorded history,
Pharaoh. The snake on his forehead made him God in the eyes of the Egyptians. The above
documents tell Pharaoh's version of creation with him slicing out the whole pie for himself.
Pharaoh was the Messiah, king of kings, lord of lords and He shall reign forever. Jesus was the
disputed Pharaoh, Amenophis IV. The bulk of the ancient Egyptian religion used to concoct the
Bible is centered around Her life and times. That story is on page 2 here.
nothing of the trek across the wilderness made by the Israelites. Are they so? Who was there to
record God saying, "let there be light?" Who recorded the events in the garden of Eden? Where
is the Tower of Babble to say nothing of who recorded that event? Did reporters tag along with
the Israelites and send communiques back to their publishers? There was no one there was
there to record the most significant events of all time. Yet they are official, absolute facts.
So it's my turn. Where did you READ that? The answer has to be one of two possibilities.
Either the authors dreamed the stories up or someone wrote them down at the time they
happened. No one claims the Bible has a written historical, recorded at the time it happened
basis except me. And I claim they READ that at Akhetaten, that the Bible is not of Jewish origin
but rather it springs from the misreading, misinterpretation of ancient Egyptian history. Giving it a
phony Jewish history makes it a hoax. That story, the true story of Moses and Jesus you have
probably already read here. It begins at the "home" page. You can get there below.
So let's examine the other possible case. If those Biblical events are the fruits of someone's
imagination then someone claiming they are absolute facts, the word of God no less makes them
lies. No, not a mistake or misinterpretation but dirty filthy lies about the most important events of
all time. They are liars who's lies have and still cause people to commit murder, suicide, hate
their neighbors, enslave their fellow man, fly hijacked airplanes into buildings, do all the things
with which the history books reek. They are the most scurrilous scoundrels that ever lived.
And that is taught to the little children as the absolute word of God. We are told that it's faith in
God and nothing more. It's faith in the written word of God, faith that the Bible is valid, the actual
history of the most significant people that ever lived including the son of God.
The little children are warned they must have faith. They must accept the God of the Bible as
the God of all creation else they will be condemned by that God to the fires of hell. And they are
forced to memorize selected lies, the garden of Eden of course, the birth of the Christ and
selected event form His life with the crucifixion being of paramount, absolute truth importance.
At the same time they are forced to believe, have faith in the Bible they are also led to believe in
Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, tooth fairy, ghosts and goblins. All the above fits into the same
category of things, fairy tales that never come true. They do effect people's lives, give them
anchors to cling to when things go wrong and things always go wrong in everyone's life.
Wasn't it Hitler's minister of propaganda that said a lie becomes a truth in the mind of the listener
when it's heard enough times? Shout it! I believe! Louder!! I believe!! Congratulations. You
have now converted a lie into a truth. Just keep saying it. It's absolutely so and you're going to
burn in Pharaoh's hell unless you believe. Who set hell on fire anyhow. Stupidity or larceny?